Tool, faculty, annex A2 of the ISC Paris AI Charter V3
Syllabus blockready to paste
Five fields to fill in, one written block you copy in a single click. The level you set, the tools you allow, those you rule out, the use statement you expect and your sentence of justification.
USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
ISC Paris AI Charter, levels N0 to N4
- Tools explicitly allowed
- Claude, ChatGPT, Mistral.
- Use statement expected
- YES. Template available in the Student Guide, paragraph 7.
- Reason for the level chosen
- The assignment assesses assisted personal output and the judgement behind it, not writing speed.
Example 2 of annex A2: analytical assignment, level N2.
Local processingEverything is composed in your browser. No data is sent, nothing is stored, no account is required. The block produced is not legal advice: it restates the charter, it does not replace it.
Four ready presets
- N0
Written exam on site
Controlled environment, phones and laptops put away, non-programmable calculator tolerated.
- N2
Analytical assignment
Rewording, translation of foreign sources, structuring of the argument.
- N3
Final dissertation
Free use, set out in the methodology, oral defence on methodological choices.
- N4
Hackathon-style project
AI is the object of the work: choice of tools, fit to context, limits identified.
Compose the block
Your block
USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ISC Paris AI Charter, levels N0 to N4 Level authorised for this course or assessment : N2, Assistance What this allows : AI for specific tasks: structure, rewording, translation. Use statement mandatory. Tools explicitly allowed : [to be completed] Tools explicitly ruled out : None. Use statement expected : YES. Template available in the Student Guide, paragraph 7. Reason for the level chosen : [to be completed] ISC Paris AI Charter V3, annex A2.
Still to complete
- at least one allowed tool
- the sentence of justification
The official template also exists in Word, Notion and Markdown, on the AITO intranet.
The first-session announcement
“This course applies the ISC Paris AI Charter. The authorisation level for this course is N2, Assistance. It means that AI is allowed for specific tasks, structure, rewording, translation. The use statement is mandatory. If you are unsure what is allowed, I would rather you asked me before submitting your work.”
Why say it out loud
Annex A2 asks for the level to be announced in the first session, on top of appearing on the first page of the syllabus. A student who has heard the rule rarely disputes it afterwards.
Before you circulate
0 of 6
Which level for which assessment
| Level | What the student may do | Recommended context | Competence assessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| N0No AI | No AI assistance. Controlled environment. | Calculation, unaided writing, invigilated exams, orals without notes | Core command, automatic skills |
| N1Preparation | AI for brainstorming and initial research. Final output written without AI. | Essays, analyses, syntheses | Synthesis and personal appropriation |
| N2Assistance | AI for specific tasks: structure, rewording, translation. Use statement mandatory. | Reports, case studies, written assignments | Assisted personal output, judgement |
| N3Collaboration | Free use of AI. Critical thinking, validation and a use statement required. | Complex projects, dissertations, assignments | Critical thinking, orchestration of tools, integration |
| N4Exploration | Command of AI itself assessed. Creative and critical use expected. | Innovation projects, hackathons, AI prototypes | Technical command, tooled creativity |
Default values
- Work submitted from home: N2, unless the teacher states otherwise.
- Invigilated exams: N0 or N1, unless stated otherwise.
- Final dissertations: N3, with a detailed use statement.
Academic freedom
ISC Paris Faculty Guide V3, paragraph 3, reasoned refusal clause.
Declaring the N0 to N4 level in the syllabus is a teaching standard recommended by V3 and supported by the AI Transformation Office. It is not a new contractual obligation.
Any member of faculty may, by reasoned decision, choose not to apply it. That refusal has no consequence on professional appraisal, career progression, teaching load, participation in governance bodies or access to institutional resources.
Regulatory obligations remain: GDPR, the AI Act, research integrity. They come from the law, not from the charter.
PDF, 1.5 MB, French